Function of Financial Institution

Published: 2021-06-27 07:55:04
essay essay

Category: Finance

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics


Financial institution is an institution that provides financial services for its clients or members. Probably the most important financial service provided by financial institutions is acting as financial intermediaries. Most financial institutions are highly regulated by government.
Function of financial institution
Financial institutions provide service as intermediaries of the capital and debt markets. They are responsible for transferring funds from investors to companies in need of those funds. Financial institutions facilitate the flow of money though the economy. To do so, saving arisk brought to provide funds for loans. Such is the primary means for depository institution to develop revenue. Should the yield curve become inverse, firms in this arena will offer additional fee-generating services including securities underwriting.
3 ways to transfer funds
Direct transfer
Firstly, this direct transfer of funds from savers to borrowers occurs when no intermediary is involved. Many large organizations will negotiate face to face with one another as it is cost effective. It can also transfer from one type of tax-deferred retirement plan or account to another. When a business sells its stocks or bond can directly go to savers without going through any type of financial institution. The business delivers its securities to savers, who in turn give the firm the money it needs. Examples of one of the use direct transfer is when an individual accepts a new job with an new employer. Assuming that both employers offer a similar retirement plan, it is possible to move the funds from the original plan to the plan that is offered by the new employer. This allows the employee to avoid having to pay taxes on the funds that are transferred, since the transaction counts as a direct rollover.
Direct trgansfers are not considered to be distributions and are therefore not taxable as income or subject to any penalties for early distribution. This type of transfer is now usually done electronically, without a check being cut from one custodian to another. Direct transfers can effect by the account owner by filling out the requisite paperwork. Normally, this transfer takes several days to complete. Although this process is now generally faster in the electronic and computer age than in the past.
Investment banking house
An organization that underwrites and distributes new investment securities and assist businesses achieve financing. For an case, Merrill Lynch which underwrites the matter. An underwriter serves as a middleman and facilitates the issuance of securities. The corporation sells its stocks or bonds to the investment bank, which in order sells these matching securities to savers.
Financial Intermediaries
Financial intermediaries are specific financial firms that facilitate the transfer of money from savers to demanders of capital. Financial intermediary such as a bank or mutual fund where simply relocate money and securities between firms and savers; they literally create new financial products. The intermediary obtains funds from savers in exchange for its individual securities. The intermediary then uses this money to buy and then hold businesses’ securities. The survival of intermediaries greatly increases the efficiency of money and capital markets. The main comparative advantage of financial intermediaries over financial markets is in overcoming the information asymmetry between borrowers and lenders. Financial intermediaries are improved right to reducing the public good trouble of free-riding. Because of financial intermediaries can make investments without helpful their actions immediately in business markets. With glowing functioning financial markets information is bare right away through financial prices, providing individual investors with less incentive and motivation to get information.
On other hand, financial intermediaries are better at before post monitoring and exerting company management than financial markets. It is because with liquid financial markets, entity investors are able to enthusiastically sell company’s shares and have fewer incentives to keep an eye on managers thoroughly. In general, they have less inside information about firms than financial intermediaries.
Furthermore, intermediaries are mostly well suited to providing external finance to newer firms that involve theatrical finance. Because financial intermediaries can extra credibly obligate to offering additional funds as projects develop, whereas pre-committed point finance is more difficult to arrange with publicly traded securities. Information asymmetries tend to be larger for small firms. This is because of reduced economies of scale with respect to acquiring information about small firms. Gertler and Gilchrist (1994a and 1994b), for example, find that bank-dependent firms with poor access to (non-bank) capital markets are typically smaller in size for the manufacturing sector in the United States. Because of the comparative advantage of financial intermediaries over financial markets in terms of collecting and processing information, countries with a large number of small firms might be expected to be more reliant on financial intermediaries than markets for external finance.
Moreover, financial intermediaries are better able to diversify aggregate risk. For example, banks have a unique ability to hedge against market wide liquidity shocks (Gatev and Strahan 2003). This is because banks are viewed as safe havens by investors. Deposits tend to flow in during periods of financial distress (low liquidity), at a time when borrowers want to draw on backup lines of credit as external finance from public securities markets has become too expensive because of low liquidity. By eliminating liquidity risk, banks can increase investment in high-return, illiquid assets and accelerate growth. Financial markets can reduce liquidity risk, but do not eliminate it.
In addition, financial intermediaries can provide intertemporal risk sharing. Financial markets are generally less well suited to provide this insurance. This is because intertemporal risk sharing requires the accumulation of reserves in safe assets whereas investors in financial markets would theoretically (though perhaps not practically) continuously adjust their portfolios to earn the highest rate of return (Dolar and Meh 2003).
Intermediaries directly undertake ex post monitoring of firm managers and exert corporate control when it is costly for outside investors to verify project returns. In Diamond’s (1984) model, financial intermediaries are delegated the costly task of monitoring loan contracts. A financial intermediary must choose an incentive contract such that it has incentives to monitor the information, make proper use of it and make sufficient payments to savers to attract deposits.Providing loan contracts and monitoring is costly and diversification can reduce these costs. In Diamond’s model, the financial intermediary need not be monitored because it bears all penalties for any shortfall of payments and because the diversification of its portfolio makes the probability of incurring these penalties very small. Moreover, the optimal size for a financial intermediary is infinite. This is because costs are lowered indefinitely by diversification, as long as the returns to borrowers are not perfectly correlated with each other.
Financial markets can also promote corporate control, for example, by structuring compensation such that managerial earnings are conditioned on firms’ performance or by easing takeovers of poorly managed firms (Jensen and Murphy 1990). With takeovers, outsiders buy poorly managed firms, fire managers and transform firms into a more productive enterprise. While takeovers may not always improve performance, in practice the threat of takeover acts to discipline management and so it is difficult to measure the full value of this function. Financial markets possibly facilitate takeovers better than financial intermediaries and thus enhance the flow of capital to its highest value use.
Financial markets provide an alternative to intermediaries and an outlet to limit the potential problems created by powerful banks. Financial intermediaries focus on obtaining information that is not available to other lenders. This focus is crucial to overcome information asymmetry and provide finance, but they may use this inside information to extract rents from firms or to protect firms with close bank ties from competition. Financial intermediaries may also collude with firm managers against other lenders and hence obstruct efficient corporate governance.
For firms able to access them, financial markets may be better suited for dealing with uncertainty, innovation and new ideas than financial intermediaries because they allow for diversity of opinion. Financial intermediaries such as banks may have a bias towards low risk projects that have a high probability of success. Intermediated financing delegates decisions about investment projects to a relatively small number of decision makers. Disagreement and discrete decision making increases the likelihood of a loan application being rejected and as a result, without specialised intermediaries, intermediated finance may result in the underinvestment in new technologies, for example. For firms with such projects, and which can not access financial markets, the role of specialised intermediaries may be pronounced.
In summary, financial intermediaries and financial markets can in many cases act as substitute sources of financial services. Lenders/savers in particular have a choice between the risk, return and liquidity offered by both segments of the financial system. Each segment is able to offer a different range of investments and offers services to firms that are not complete substitutes. Broadly speaking, financial markets provide lower cost arms length debt or equity finance to a smaller group of firms able to obtain such finance, while financial intermediaries offer finance with a higher cost reflecting the expense of uncovering information and ongoing monitoring. Financial intermediaries and markets may also provide complementary financial services to many firms.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read